Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bibiane Schoofs vs Linda Fruhvirtova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schoofs vs Fruhvirtova analysis and find out who is favored!
Bibiane Schoofs vs Linda Fruhvirtova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schoofs 1 - 0 Fruhvirtova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schoofs has won 46.3% of points on their second serve, while Fruhvirtova has won 42.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schoofs, in recent form, has won 62.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fruhvirtova has won 56.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.15% and 38.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schoofs has saved 65.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fruhvirtova has saved 52.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schoofs has won 25% of matches played (W/L 2/ 6), with Fruhvirtova winning 44.83% (W/L 26/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schoofs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 230/ 136), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Fruhvirtova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 62/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 19/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Schoofs has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4), where as Fruhvirtova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 16/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schoofs winning 1 times and Fruhvirtova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schoofs winning 2 and Fruhvirtova winning 0. The last match between Schoofs and Fruhvirtova was at the W25 Altenkirchen, 28-02-2020, Quarterfinals, Carpet with Bibiane Schoofs getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schoofs and Fruhvirtova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schoofs winning 0 times and Fruhvirtova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schoofs winning 0, and Fruhvirtova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schoofs has played against opponents with an average rank of 395.5 while Fruhvirtova has played against players with an average rank of 217.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schoofs has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fruhvirtova has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schoofs has converted 43.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fruhvirtova has converted 48.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
869
Rank
142
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
139
Rank
49
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
60% (375-255)
Career Total W/L
55% (97-80)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
47% (14-16)
$166,421
Career Prize Money
$891,307
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Bibiane Schoofs vs Linda Fruhvirtova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Schoofs VS Fruhvirtova
Sportsbook
Offer
Schoofs VS Fruhvirtova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Bibiane Schoofs | Linda Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:54:0 | 0:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (25/44) | 56% (28/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 61% (17/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 23% (5/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (28/50) | 30% (13/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Schoofs VS Fruhvirtova H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bibiane Schoofs | Linda Fruhvirtova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 47% (14/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 49% (35/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (59/61) | 50% (336/332) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 141 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:35 | 1:48:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 371 | 230.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (277/439) | 62% (1407/2257) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (165/277) | 62% (877/1407) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (75/162) | 42% (359/850) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (23/53) | 49% (129/265) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (180/398) | 45% (976/2164) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (8/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 47% (14/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 81% (16/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 19% (16/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 7% (14/1) |
Bibiane Schoofs Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Eden Silva
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eden Silva
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
72%
(
84 of
116)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bibiane Schoofs
Player
Manon Leonard
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nagi Hanatani
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
8
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalia Siedliska
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Linda Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Yuriko Miyazaki
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
6
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Samantha Murray
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
122
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(3) 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Amelia Rajecki
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Linda Fruhvirtova
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
49%
(
47 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Viktorija Golubic
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Schoofs Vs Fruhvirtova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Schoofs are available here and Fruhvirtova photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
